National Geographic Sells Out

Our Editor-in-Chief is back… and, as usual, he sounds off on something that bugs him.

National Geographic Centro Cultural Kirchner

So, I was recently dismayed to learn that National Geographic has issued a Special Edition in Spanish about the Nestor Kirchner Cultural Center in Argentina.

On the surface, this would seem to be reasonably aligned with National Geographic’s mission.  After all, on their website, National Geographic says that they want to inspire, illuminate and teach.  But (there always seems to be a “but” in these things, doesn’t there…) it isn’t quite that simple.

You see, this latest supplement is not a simple article about a cultural center that many people in the Spanish-speaking world are likely to be interested in.  This, as so ably chronicled by La Nación, Argentina’s most respected newspaper, is a particularly crass pandering to media dollars by the society in a critical election year in that South American country.  The cultural center is not just named after the current Kirchnerist government’s founder, but is also a monument to their belief that an ideal world can only be reached through their particular continuation of Mussolini’s old ideas, reinforced with concepts of isolationism, populism and certain elements of postmodern socialism.

Of course, it can be argued that a democratic country’s culture is well-reflected by its government, so the supplement is a valid informative piece – except for the fact that just a month before it hit the streets, 60% of Argentina’s population voted against the Kirchnerist government in an obligatory presidential first round election.

Even if the population hadn’t expressed its desire to find a different, more modern road forward, the supplement itself reads like a political manifesto written by a virulent opposer of free market economics (which is weird, because the last time I checked, the Society was based in a somewhat non-socialist country), savagely criticizing what many feel to be the last true era of modernization in the country.

Worse still, one of the spokespeople for the government appears in no less than four photos…

We’ve sounded off against the sheer barefaced destruction of the truth by this government before, but I sincerely can’t believe that a publication as well-respected as National Geographic would publish something like this for any amount of money.  This is a government that has lied about inflation statistics – even firing members of the statistics bureau who wished to inform the true numbers – and attacked the free press openly and violently during its entire run.

It is a government that has actively attempted to promote ignorance and isolation – everything that National Geographic is supposed to combat.  But it seems that this government’s desperate election money was stronger than the principles established for so long.

National Geographic has betrayed out trust.

But worse, it has betrayed itself.

2 comments

  1. agreed. I just read in La Nation about this special edition and could not believe it!!!! Either is too much money involved or a level of ignorance on National Geographic’s part or both! It’s plain and simply political propaganda with the objective of deepening the brain washing that this government has been doing since it took power 10 years ago! I’m shocked that NG has elected to be part of a model that believes an “elite” composed for pseudo intellectuals should determine what we read, what we watch, what we buy, where we travel. That’s what this is… very ignorant on NG part if they did not know this… or knowingly and for a reason, they still decide to publish it!

    Like

    1. Unless National Geographic publicly issues some kind of justification which sounds logical, I will remain convinced that either the local team was bribed or that the government paid a huge amount of money for this. National Geographic was not an innocent dupe in this, it is run by people who understand geopolitics extremely well. They also know extremely well that this is an election year, and that their actions are even more contemptible in that context. So a LOT of money, then…

      Like

Leave a reply to andrea (@andreavillal) Cancel reply