I was talking to an acquaintance recently, and was amazed and more than a little dismayed when she said “Astrology is a science, just like math.” When I expressed my utter disbelief that anyone with even a smattering of education could possibly utter such a statement in the 21st century, she dismissed me as closed-minded and, safe in the knowledge that a majority of society would back her on that point, spoke about other things.
Never has, in my opinion, the modern iteration of ignorance been so eloquently expressed.
So, in order to learn about the people who share these modern times with us, let’s dissect the incident:
Astrology is a science…
Well, one thing that astrology is NOT is a science. To summarize centuries of development, science is a process by which hypothesis are tested via empirical data and then the theory is modified to fit the data. As anyone objective can easily see, astrology works precisely opposite. The results are given first (Scorpios kick babies, prefer to drink white wines and are only compatible with Gemini) and then the data is peered at through distorting lenses to make it seem like it fits. It is much more akin to a religion than a science. Wikipedia calls it a pseudoscience, because it attempts to clothe non-scientific methods within a scientific framework, but I think Wikipedia is being both generous and politically correct (can’t get funding if potential donors are offended).
So when discussing this, the defenders of astrology will say that testing is unnecessary because there are millennia of tradition behind it, and there’s no need to verify further. Er… Yeah, that would also have worked when Columbus was yammering about the Earth not being flat.
So… why do people insist that it’s a science? Well, despite the growing trendiness of aggressive ignorance disguised as “a democratic right to different points of view”, there is still a feeling in society that science and logic are much more intellectually respectable than spiritualism. So people lie to themselves (and attempt unsuccessfully to lie to intelligent observers) in order to feel respected as opposed to the alternative: feeling like ignorant cretins when faced with the raised eyebrow of a respected member of the peer group. It’s better to dismiss logical arguments as “the limitations of people who think they’re educated” than to just admit that astrology is more of a fun, brain-dead way to spend time – like watching Dancing with the Stars – than anything approaching a science.
Just like math…
The discussion of whether mathematics is or isn’t a science probably would have gone over her head, but this article on the topic is simply awesome, especially the bit about Cicadas, so I just had to link it here.
Ok, so that’s the breakdown of her phrase, but the more disturbing bit is her sense of security that society would back her up. In this case, I tend to agree with her. That is a bit worrying, and it led me to asking myself why society seems to prefer to support certain ignorant theories and marginalize people who try to debunk them as elitists*
I think the answer is twofold. In the first place, I’d like to offer the hypothesis that there’s a large correlation between the kind of people who think that astrology is a science and the the kind of people who watch a LOT of TV. As is pretty evident to even casual viewers, TV content is not designed to stimulate the intellect, but rather to pander to more basic needs: low entertainment, fear-mongering and (particularly relevant in this case) the reinforcement of beliefs. Now, to meet these needs, even the documentary channels have needed to adapt, as we’ve discussed before. And if it’s on the Discovery Channel, then it must be true, right**?
The second half of the answer has more to do with how society has evolved in the decades since the second world war. After the war, society has become obsessed with safety in all forms, be it physical or psychological. The many have, in their wisdom, decided that freedom is less important that safety (see: mandatory helmet laws, myriad). Even feelings are to be preserved… if someone hurts your feelings, they are in the wrong, and therefore “safe places” need to be created where they can’t do so.
As educated, intelligent people are a minority, their opinions are normally dismissed as elitist, which immediately equates them with such immoral bastards as the filthy rich*. So, to protect themselves from feelings of inferiority, the mob has made astrology a socially accepted topic – and mocking astrology the province of evil, “limited” people who can’t see beyond what their senses tell me. So, once again, we decide what is scientifically correct by democracy***.
Is it just me, or should an educated society work in precisely the opposite way?
*Please note that here at Classically Educated, we consider the word “elite” to be a compliment, definitely not an insult. If you are reading this, and feel that being elite is bad, you probably landed on this site by mistake! We also oppose the discrimination against rich people – in fact, we oppose discrimination against any minority… fortunately, dumb people are not a minority, so you’re good there.
**This footnote isn’t actually linked to anything in particular, but I just had to mention traditional remedies. All I have to say about that is that most ancient societies had life spans of about thirty years. I am certain you are intelligent enough to draw your own conclusions about traditional medicine from that fact, and I don’t have to give you any further subtle hints.
***Can we vote to repeal the law of gravity? Hover cars sound way cool.