I’ll admit that my opinion of Judith Merril as a selector of Year’s Best stories was colored by my first impression. I had the terrible misfortune that the first of her books that I read was SF12, and it’s still, by a huge margin, the worst collection of science fiction stories I’ve ever read, both on the story selection side and from the viewpoint of the editor’s notes that went with it.
Yea, I know that one was from the mid-sixties, but it’s a wonderful example of someone trying to hard and really, really screwing up.
The Best of Science Fiction 10 does not climb those exalted heights of inanity, but it’s not good by any means.
In this case the problem is mainly story selection, as Merril, though more opinionated than one would prefer in her comments, is at least less disruptive and lets the stories speak for themselves without turning the entire book into some manifesto for her theories (which turned out not to have proven correct). Or at least not as much as in SF12.
Perhaps I’m spoiled. The Year’s Best and best of SF books I grew up on were those where the stories were selected by Dozois, Conklin, Wollheim, Hartwell and Asimov/Greenberg. These books were focused on core SF, unconcerned with pushing the agenda of some critical theory or another, and still manage to showcase the literary end of the spectrum without disappearing up their own assholes.
Merril? Well, let’s just say that with the number of books she edited, I’m surprised no one had to file a missing persons report on her.
So what’s the problem with this one?
As far as I can tell, Merril was obsessed with two notions when reading for this volume. The first was that the sense that science fiction isn’t serious literature needed to be assaulted with fury. It was imperative to prove–not just say, mind you, but PROVE–that the genre can stand toe to toe with those serious writers that produce work that moves forward the cause of western civilization. You know… the ones who write for The New Yorker.
The second obsession was with the whole “boundaries of science fiction and fantasy” thing. Now, I’m the first to admit that there is a large reader overlap between the two genres and, as a writer, I’ve crossed genres a time or two. But…
But I do believe there is a definition of science fiction, and dropping ghosts and dragons into a story pretty much disqualifies the tale (unless they’re genetically modified dragons bred for a specific purpose like McCaffrey’s).
I’d say about a third of this book falls outside the boundaries of science fiction and into the fantasy genre.
Worse, of the ones that did fall into SF back in 1964 (the year these stories were published), a depressing number of them were chosen because they focused on the emerging sciences of massy psychology / psychiatry and ESP. Merril was of the opinion (proven wrong these past 60 years) that these sciences would move far beyond the manipulation of masses as perfected by the Nazis and into truly outlandish, science fictional spaces.
They haven’t, and ESP has been relegated to fantasy.
Sadly, these obsessions squeezed out the real SF, leaving the closet quite bare when it came to selecting a favorite among those. There were no Asimov or Heinlein tales deemed worthy that year (which is doubly baffling considering what actually was in there), but Clarke came to the rescue with a story that, though not one of his best, was good enough to make it stand out in this company: “The Shining Ones”.
Best story of all was not an SF tale, and barely–with the suggestion of a possible ghost story–a genre tale at all. But when you can include a story by John D MacDonald in a collection, you do it, and don’t ask too many questions. “The Legend of Joe Lee” is a spectacularly well-written story. Wrong for this book, but wonderful. Finally, I will confess to having enjoyed Rick Raphael’s “Sonny” despite being an ESP tale and having a crap ending. The writing just pulls you in.
So, can I recommend this one?
Yes, but mainly to people looking to deepen their knowledge of the genre, and perhaps to understand the gestalt from 60 years ago, when many of us weren’t born.
Gustavo Bondoni’s latest novel is a science fiction thriller (no fantasy elements in this one, I’m afraid -Merril wouldn’t have approved). It’s called Splinter, and you can check it out here.