Yeah, I know that title is a bit aggressive, and probably unfair, considering that both this issue and the last one I read were both much better than the usual politics-driven snorefests. Instead of being an example of partisan drivel that will annoy half of the intelligent people on the planet (and cause the other half to raise their eyebrows at the obvious bending of truths to pander to one side of the political spectrum), these latest issues appear more balanced, and therefore more intelligent.
Except for the idiotic lead article for the latest one.
The article is entitled “Coin Toss” but the outside cover leaf announces it as: “How to lose a Bitcoin fortune.”
It tells the story of a man in Wales who accidentally threw away a hard drive with a bitcoin key now worth half a billion dollars.
Now, while this is interesting, it would seem to appeal more to the kind of people who block traffic by slowing down to get a really good look at an ugly car crash than to the typical New Yorker reader. It’s straight-up voyeurism mixed with schadenfreude. It’s the stuff of small-minded people’s wet dreams. National Enquirer stuff. (albeit extremely well-written considering the extremely limited interest of the subject – this disaster wasn’t the writer’s fault)
Might this be a sign that TNY is having financial difficulties and needed to raise revenue by lowering the intellectual bar? A sign that the move away from strident politics (and the sales that drives from sad, angry people) needs to be balanced somehow? Or maybe it was just a really bad miss by the editor. I don’t know. Sadly I only read the ones I buy when I travel to the US, so I can’t really identify trends here.
Now the good news: the rest of the mag was up to the usual standards, and the activism, like in the previous issue appears to be toned down, a great sign.
Particularly gratifying was that the fiction piece, “A Shooting in Rathreedane” by Colin Barrett is the best short story I’ve ever read in The New Yorker. A wonderful little police procedural with extremely regional dialogue that also serves as a character sketch–albeit a subtle one. It absolutely surprised me, in a very positive way.
And perhaps that’s the nicest thing about The New Yorker. It’s a grab-bag of a magazine that can fall to the lowest intellectual depths of anti-intellectual pandering or zombie-like political activism and then rise to the sublime. You never know if what comes next will elevate, educate or irritate.
And that is good enough to keep me coming back on occasion.
Gustavo Bondoni’s latest book is a collection of science fiction and fantasy crime stories entitled Thin Air. He hopes readers enjoy the stories as much as he loved writing them. You can check it out here.